The correct answer is B. Books, hope this helps :)
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:
A(n) <u><em>monochronic</em></u> American visitor to <u><em>polychronic</em></u> Egyptian client may be frustrated as he or she waits for meetings to begin then finds the meeting regularly interrupted.
Explanation:
Monochronic can be described as a culture in which the people belonging to that culture like to do one thing at a time. These people do not like interruptions.
On the other hand, polychronic people tend to do multiple tasks at a given time.
The interruption of a meeting will be frustrating for any person whether the person be a monochronic or a polychronic.
