Answer:
There is a brainial difference
Explanation:
They brain doesnt think like ours does because we can wait stop and think unlike an animal that just has insticts and just acts which can lead to bad things.
Answer:
stimulus generalization
Explanation:
<u>Stimulus generalization is the process that occurs when our conditioned reaction to one stimulus is similar to the reaction that revokes other, sometimes identical, stimulus.</u>
In this example, we see that Sheeba is reacting to the sound of the vacuum cleaner, and she started connecting the noise of the vacuum to the noise of the mixer. Therefore, <u>they are generalized stimuli, put in the same category in her consciousness, and awaking the same barking and attacking reaction.</u>
I think it would be A if anything
<u>Aesthetics </u>is defined as the philosophical study of art and of value judgments about art.
The field of philosophy known as aesthetics is focused on the nature and appreciation of beauty, art, and good taste. The phrase "critical meditation on art, culture, and nature" has also been used to describe it.
The Greek term "Aisthetikos," which means "of sense perception," is where the word "aesthetics" originates. Axiology includes aesthetics along with ethics (the study of values and value judgments).
Assessments of aesthetic worth depend on our capacity for sensory discrimination, but they typically go beyond that. A sensory, emotional, and intellectual component all go into making a judgment of beauty.
Immanuel Kant asserts that all things are lovely (i.e. certain things are beautiful to everyone). However, there is a second, more arbitrary element at play in a viewer's perception of beauty—taste.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about Aesthetics here
brainly.com/question/24568271
#SPJ4
Researchers often use computers in their experiments to keep from influencing the participants and to keep themselves <u>blind</u> regarding the conditions to which the participants have been assigned.
<h3><u>Why is research blinding crucial?</u></h3>
Blinding is crucial to prevent bias (such as observer bias and demand characteristics) and guarantee the internal validity of a study.
Participants may alter their behavior in ways that affect the outcome that researchers are aiming to measure if they are aware of whether they are in a control or treatment group. If those providing the treatment are aware of the participants' assigned groups, they may treat them differently, which could either directly or indirectly affect the outcome.
Learn more about research blinding with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3453118?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
