First, it is necessary that this scientist decide on what point of the Cretaceous period he wants to study. Among several points he may want to study the evolution of microorganisms of that time, the life of a dinosaur species, or the evolution of dinosaurs, the flora that was established during this period, among others. This is the phase of the scientific method called Observation.
After that, he must enter the phase called "Elaboration of hypotheses" where he will raise questions about the point he decided to study. "How many flower species existed in that period?", "How many of these flowers can we observe today?" among others.
After that, he will enter the phase called "Experimentation", where he will establish a type of experiment and all the experimental factors and variables that will allow the hypotheses to be answered.
After the experiment he will collect the data that will be analyzed and that will give results that will answer the hypotheses previously established. This is the phase called "Analysis of the results".
At that moment, he will be able to reach the last phase of the scientific method, the phase called "conclusion", where he will show the conclusions that the experiment allowed to be established.
A punnet square is a diagram that is use to predict an outcome of a particular cross or breed experiments. So base on the following data you have given, the possible answer would be that the punnet square data in horizontal are is RY, RY,rY,rY. In the vertical are is RY Ry RY Ry. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more
Basically, when something grows it demonstrates an increment in something you can check. A tree can grow. That implies that it adds to its tallness. We can number the inches it has developed. An association can develop, adding individuals or different gatherings to itself. These are numbered effortlessly. Benefit can grow, including cash in diverse ways. Growth without anyone else's input, in any case, can't gauge advancement. If we take a gander at the stature of a man, it might be anything but difficult to accept they are a grown-up. When I was in evaluation school, a comrade of mine was more than six feet when he was only 11 years of age. If we take a gander at how tall he was, he would be viewed as a grown-up. Be that as it may, at that age, my comrade wasn't sufficiently created in his reasoning, not to mention passionate growth, to be viewed as a grown-up. There is an enormous difference. Without a waste of time, what is development? Development envelops numerous things however it is demonstrated by the subjective change of circumstances. This implies that as something adds to the nature of the entire makes strides. As a tree creates, it won't just develop, additionally have the capacity to replicate, like a natural product, be sound and proceed with growing. Hopefully, this clears up the most evident contrasts between the term development and growth and can direct you to a few assets that will help you toward better comprehension!
Answer:
D. on the surface, directly above the focus