Answer:
NO.
Step-by-step explanation:
In geometry, two figures or objects are congruent if they have the same shape and size, or if one has the same shape and size as the mirror image of the other. So, in other words, 2 shapes or figures in geometry are congruent if they have the exact same size and shape.
A rectangle has 2 pairs of parallel sides. One pair is longer than the other pair. Therefore, to be congruent, all sides have to be equal, which is a square, not a rectangle. So the answer is NO.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
78.71 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
You're looking for the solution to ...
d = 88
0.0015r^2 +r = 88
0.0015r^2 +r -88 = 0
Using the quadratic formula*, we find ...
r = (-1 +√(1² -4(0.0015)(-88)))/(2×0.0015)
r = (-1 +√1.528)/0.003 = 0.236123/0.003 = 78.7077
The speed of the car was about 78.71 mph.
_____
* The quadratic formula will also give a negative answer of about -745 mph, which is not relevant to the situation.
Answer:
2/-3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helped. And I know that you can choose more than one, but I'm pretty sure this is the only one that's equivalent to -2/3
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
This is exponential decay; the height of the ball is decreasing exponentially with each successive drop. It's not going down at a steady rate. If it was, this would be linear. But gravity doesn't work on things that way. If the ball was thrown up into the air, it would be parabolic; if the ball is dropped, the bounces are exponentially dropping in height. The form of this equation is
, or in our case:
, where
a is the initial height of the ball and
b is the decimal amount the bounce decreases each time. For us:
a = 1.5 and
b = .74
Filling in,
If ww want the height of the 6th bounce, n = 6. Filling that into the equation we already wrote for our model:
which of course simplifies to
which simplifies to
So the height of the ball is that product.
A(6) = .33 cm
A is your answer