When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
Answer:
Truth in sentencing movement
Explanation:
Truth in sentencing movement - Truth in sentencing (TIS) is a set of various but linked social policy positions on the sentencing of those found guilty of offences in the judicial system. To decrease the likelihood of earlier release from rehabilitation, truth in sentencing legislation are implemented.
Ashoka was the third emperor of the Maurya, a dynasty between the 4th and 2nd centuries B.C. He dominated almost the entirety of India, Pakistan and part of Afghanistan.
