Answer:
A. uncertainty
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the most likely reason for such employee resistance to change is uncertainty. This basically revolves around not knowing what is going to happen or the information regarding some sort of change. Such as not knowing the details of the area in which Desiree will have to move to if she were to accept her new promotion.
Answer:
B. agreements between two or more parties
Explanation:
if you were to sign a contract for something huge and you were broke the contract before you had finish the time that you had signed whom ever you signed it could end in a law sue and maybe even jail time.
Hope this helps :)
Answer: c. preventing a market that would generate mutually beneficial trades.
Explanation:
Zooey could argue that the policy of lunch trades is preventing a market that would generate mutually beneficial trades because if people were allowed to trade what they want for what they have with people who have what the first person wants and wants what the first person has, that can be beneficial to both of them.
It is not unlike the system of batter trading that existed before money where people traded what they had for what they wanted.
One should be very careful here though because there are multiple disadvantages involved such as kids exchanging away more nutritious food and food poisoning.
Answer:
Option C is correct
Explanation:
This means an increase in actual price would make quantity aggregate supply curve to shift to the right.
<span>In this case, Sara will see the ramen as a good that is more elastic in demand than will Sean. This will mean that, as income drops for Sara, she will purchase less of the good than will Sean. Sean will end up purchasing less of the good if he has an increase in income.</span>
