1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
In-s [12.5K]
3 years ago
5

_________________ are more likely to arise from a group that is easily identifiable, rather than from a group where some of thos

e who suffered may not even recognize that _____________________________.
A. Connected peoples; specific tax breaks exist for them
B. Socially isolated people; government intervention is needed
C. Special interests; they are bearing the costs
D. Beneficiaries; rent controls are in effect
Business
1 answer:
laiz [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is: C) Special interests; they are bearing the costs.

Explanation:

A group of people, institutions or companies that share a common goal are more likely to achieve them or be more successful at their execution when they are easily and publicly identified to them. In politics, this is the whole concept behind lobbying. Generally those groups that take the effort to make their demands public will be more successful in achieving them. That is true even if some other group or the majority of the population suffers from those actions.

We can use the NRA as an example for this assumption. They are a well organized, funded and publicized group that firmly believes in their right to bear arms. I myself share that same belief. But I doubt anyone could argue why we need to sell machine guns or grenade launchers to common ordinary people that aren´t even trained to use them. But they have made their claim so well known and connected with the right politicians, that even mass murdering machines are available to the common public. And the cost of their actions are been paid mostly by innocent victims (and their families and communities) and the nation as a whole.

You might be interested in
Erosion can best be explained as the:
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

A. loss of current sales due to a new project being implemented.

Explanation:

In business, erosion takes place when a new product or project competes with another product or project from the came company. This "internal" competition reduces the revenues and benefits from existing products or projects. It is basically a form of business cannibalization, where the left arm takes away from the right arm. E.g. newer smartphone models decrease the sales revenue from existing (older) models.

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose a firm estimates its WACC to be 10%. Should the WACC be used to evaluate all of its potential projects, even if they var
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

The WACC will be 10% for average risk

below when the risk is low

and above 10% when the risk is higher than average

as the cost of capital (required return from the stockholders) will increase pushing the WACC higher

Explanation:

As the WACC is composed by the cost of debt and the cost of equity a higher risk will require a better return for the investor thus, the equity proportion that determinates the WACC will change along the project risk.

6 0
3 years ago
An all-equity firm is considering the following projects:
lakkis [162]

Answer:

A. Compared with the firm's 12 percent cost of capital, Project W has a_______expected return.

  • a. lower

1. Project X has a______expected return.

  • b. lower

2. Project Y has a_______expected return

  • b. higher

3. Project Z has a______expected return.

  • a. higher

B. Project W should be_______.

  • b. rejected

1. Project X should be______.

  • b. rejected

2. Project Y should be_______.

  • a. accepted

3. Project Z should be_______.

  • a. accepted

c. If the firm's overall cost of capital were used as a hurdle rate, Project W would be_______.

  • c. correctly rejected

1. Project X would be______.

  • c. correctly rejected

2. Project Y would be_______.

  • b. correctly accepted

3. Project Z would be________.

  • b. correctly rejected

Explanation:

Project    Beta     IRR        <u> expected return</u>

W             .62      9.2%       = 5% + (0.62 x 7%) = 9.34%

X              .77      10.3 %     = 5% + (0.77 x 7%) = 10.39%

Y            1.27       14.1 %      = 5% + (1.27 x 7%) = 13.89%

Z            1.42       17.0%     = 5% + (1.42 x 7%) = 14.94%

8 0
3 years ago
which of the following is true about product life cycles? group of answer choices a reminder promotion is normally used in the i
bulgar [2K]

Based on business strategies and production, the statement that is true about product life cycles is "Early adopters buy in the introductory phase."

<h3>What is the Life Cycle of a Product</h3>

The life cycle of a product is a term that is used to describe the proportion of time a product goes from being introduced into the market by the producers until it's taken off the shelve.

Usually, the product life cycle is in different stages, and each of the stages is important to the success of the products in the market.

<h3>The Life cycle of a product is the following:</h3>
  • introduction,
  • growth,
  • maturity, and
  • decline.

Generally, the in the introduction stage of a product's life the early adopters are the first category of consumers that try new products before most other consumers key into it.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option c. "Early adopters buy in the introductory phase."

Learn more about the Product Life cycle here: brainly.com/question/7510515

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
A cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a(n): incremental cost. opportunity co
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

sunk cost.

Explanation:

Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.

Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.

Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.

Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.

For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A soft drink company has researched the possibility of marketing a new low-calorie beverage, in a study region. The expected pro
    15·1 answer
  • What should you look for to be sure you can trust the source of information on a webpage?
    8·1 answer
  • Recently passed rules for defining academic progress and graduation rates for ncaa division i teams shift more responsibility fo
    9·1 answer
  • When Raoul Welsh is evaluating the construction industry in terms of interest rates, employment cycles, and the rate of new home
    14·1 answer
  • Choose the statement that is incorrect. A. Search activity occurs only in markets where there is a shortage. B. The time spent l
    10·1 answer
  • Last year, Tinklenberg Corporation's variable costing net operating income was $52,400 and its inventory decreased by 1,400 unit
    10·1 answer
  • Christy works for a magazine publishing company. When pressed to meet a deadline, every employee is expected to work together to
    7·2 answers
  • In late December you​ decide, for tax​ purposes, to sell a losing position that you hold in​ Twitter, which is listed on t
    12·1 answer
  • A firm has a debt-total asset ratio of 61 percent and a return on total assets of 11.4 percent. What is the return on equity
    11·1 answer
  • Sand Point Corporation's common stock recently paid a dividend of $1.50. Investors require a 16% rate of return on this stock. S
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!