Let

. Then

. By convention, every non-zero integer

divides 0, so

.
Suppose this relation holds for

, i.e.

. We then hope to show it must also hold for

.
You have

We assumed that

, and it's clear that

because

is a multiple of 3. This means the remainder upon divides

must be 0, and therefore the relation holds for

. This proves the statement.
Answer:
Sometimes
Step-by-step explanation:
When x is a nonzero integer, then x can be
If x is negative, then
is positive (multiplying negative number by -3 you get positive number).
If x is positive, then
is negative (multiplying positive number by -3 you get negative number).
So, the statement "When x is a nonzero integer, the quantity -3x will be negative" is sometimes true.
Answer:
Its 5
Step-by-step explanation:
25 divided by 5 is 5
Answer:
F = -44. I have attached the work too
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
Given 2x + 7 - x when x = 3
2(3) + 7 - 3
6 + 7 - 3
6 + 4
10