Sites within the human genome where a short nucleotide sequence is repeated many times in a row are known as short tandem repeats.
DNA sequences with 2 to 6 base pairs are known as short tandem repeats (STRs), and they are dispersed throughout the genome. Multiple repetitions of these brief sequences are possible, and the number of repetitions varies greatly between people. The capacity to distinguish one sample from another is made possible by the great variability.
The Y-STR method's primary benefit is its capacity to identify the male component even in severe male-to-female DNA mixes. The number of semen donors for combinations of two or more male persons can be determined using it, as well as for quickly screening a large number of stains.
Due to their occasionally poor biostatistical efficiency and the potential to detect one or more genetic discrepancies that might potentially be explained by mutational events, STRs have a few drawbacks when examining genetic links in deficient cases.
To know more about short tandem repeats refer to: brainly.com/question/15016218
#SPJ1
I believe it’s false. Sorry if I’m wrong !
Explanation:
The kind of archaeology that was practiced mainly by the American archaeologist in the early to mid-twentieth century is to explore the culture history. The culture history "explains" the differences or the changes over time in the frequencies of the artifacts by postulating the diffusion of several ideas between the nearby cultures or the migration of the people who had different beliefs and mental templates for the artifact styles.
It is different from scientific explanation as scientific explanation of new archaeology needs to be more scientific and more anthropological. All the hypothesis should be tested.
Hannah meant by saying that to know the truth we should look at the Philosophy Department is that you will get all your answer to the question in the philosophy department.
Plateau because of the fresh water I think
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
