All categories

3 years ago

Can someone please explain 10 3/4 - 6 4/4 ??

Mathematics

2 answers:

xxMikexx [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

43/4 - 28/4 = (43 - 28)/4 = 15/4 or 3 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

10 3/4 - 6 4/4 . The expression means we should find the difference between 10 3/4 and 6 4/4. The best approach to find the difference of this kind of fractions with whole number is by turning each to an improper fraction.

10 3/4 . This whole number fraction can be turn to an improper fraction as follows

10 × 4 + 3 = 43 then 43/4

6 4/4. 4 × 6 + 4 = 28/4.

Now , let's find the difference

The denominator is same, which is 4

43/4 - 28/4 = (43 - 28)/4 = 15/4 or 3 3/4

motikmotik3 years ago

4 0

3 3/4 is the answer

10 3/4 --- 43/4

6 4/4--- 7 or 28/4

43/4- 28/4= 15/4

15/4 simplified is 3 3/4

You might be interested in

What is the least to greatest area

dolphi86 [110]

Least to greatest:
nevada, arizona, californa, montana, texas, alaska

5 0

4 years ago

Find the total surface area of the figure shown. 20 cm 16 cm 10 cm 12 cm

galben [10]

Answer:

672

Step-by-step explanation:

(1/2×16×12)×2 + (10×12) + (10×16) + (20×10)

8 0

3 years ago

Help please please pleaseee!!! (check the picture)

Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

the answer is x < - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

see the pictures for the step by step explanation

i hope this helps

if you need more help understanding algebraic inequality's

if this helps please give brainliest

and 5 stars

Also share this answer so it can help others

thanks,

skymillie28

Expert

6 0

3 years ago

What is the molar mass of UF6??

Verdich [7]

Answer:

I think it's 352. 02 g/mol

Step-by-step explanation:

googled it :)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

n 2018, homes in East Baton Rouge (EBR) Parish sold for an average of $239,000. You take a random sample of homes in Ascension p

Olenka [21]

Answer:

Conclusion

There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The population mean for EBR is $\mu_ 1 = \$239,000$

The sample mean for Ascension parish is $\= x_2 = \$246,000$

The p-value is $p-value = 0.045$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \mu_2 = \mu_1$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \mu_2 > \mu_1$

Here $\mu_2$ is the population mean for Ascension parish

From the data given values we see that

$p-value > \alpha$

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis

So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean

3 0

3 years ago