Answer:
D. three-quarters
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. It is too low.
B. is not the right answer. France is provided with more nuclear power.
C. is not the correct answer. This percent is too much.
<u> D. is the right answer. A total of 75% of France’s electrical power is provided by nuclear power, meaning three-quarters of the country. </u><u>France is one of the world’s biggest consumers of electricity,</u> which is why they set the goal to lower the consumption of nuclear energy by a quarter in the next 35 years.
Answer:
People spend more money
Explanation:
This means that if more people come, people spend more which then increases the economy of that state.
Answer:
6 billion
Explanation:
The world's population reached its first billion in 1804. By the year 1960, there were approximately three billion of people on earth. By the year 1999, the population grew to 6 billion.
According to recent prognostics, by the year 2024, the world's population would reach eight billion people.
The world population is the total number of humans currently occupying the earth. The highest population growth rates happened between the years 1950-1970.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
