Answer:
1)
![\left[\begin{array}{cccccc}$department&$salaries&OASDI&HI&SUTA&FUTA\\$office&22,760&1,411.12&341.4&280&42\\$sales&65,840&4,082.08&987.6&280&42\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccccc%7D%24department%26%24salaries%26OASDI%26HI%26SUTA%26FUTA%5C%5C%24office%2622%2C760%261%2C411.12%26341.4%26280%2642%5C%5C%24sales%2665%2C840%264%2C082.08%26987.6%26280%2642%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
2) payroll expense entries:
payroll expense 2063.14
Medicare payable 330.02
Social Security payable 1411.12
SUTA 280
FUTA 42
--------------------------------------------
payroll expense 5358.76
Medicare payable 954.68
Social Security payable 4082.08
SUTA 280
FUTA 42
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccccc}$department&$salaries&OASDI&HI&SUTA&FUTA\\$office&22,760&1,411.12&341.4&280&42\\$sales&65,840&4,082.08&987.6&280&42\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccccc%7D%24department%26%24salaries%26OASDI%26HI%26SUTA%26FUTA%5C%5C%24office%2622%2C760%261%2C411.12%26341.4%26280%2642%5C%5C%24sales%2665%2C840%264%2C082.08%26987.6%26280%2642%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We apply for each department the tax rate. Notice SUTA and FUTA have a ceilling of 7,000 so we do not apply the rate to the whole amoung but, for the 7,000 ceiling.
Based on the correlational analysis of X and Y that is given, we can infer that there is a linear relationship between X and Y.
<h3>What does the correlation analysis show?</h3>
The Pearson correlation coefficient shows if there is a linear relationship between given variables.
In the given table, the Pearson Correlation coefficient is not 0 for either variable which means that a linear relationship does in fact exist between the variables.
Find out more on the Pearson correlation coefficient at brainly.com/question/24084533.
#SPJ1
There are several negative effects..It is usually more expensive, it will also reduce GDP .ect
In this case, the economy had been suffering from a recession leading to lower output, aggregate demand and real GDP. The government can boost the economy by engaging in expansionary fiscal policy.
Government can implement expansionary fiscal policy by increasing government spending on goods and services, which will directly increase aggregate demand, thus boosting income and real GDP. Alternatively the government can lower tax rate. When individual tax rate falls, personal disposable income rises, increasing consumption demand and aggregate demand. When business tax rate falls, corporate net profits rise, which encourages firms to invest more in expanding their output. Higher investment by corporate firms increase aggregate demand.
A.
getting money with special repayment terms