Answer:
Yes, we have sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the executive's claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a publisher reports that 79% of their readers own a personal computer. A marketing executive wants to test the claim that the percentage is actually more than the reported percentage. A random sample of 100 found that 89% of the readers owned a personal computer.
Let Null Hypothesis,
: p
0.79 {means that the percentage is actually less than or equal to the reported percentage}
Alternate Hypothesis,
: p > 0.79 {means that the percentage is actually more than the reported percentage}
The test statics that will be used here is One-sample proportions test;
T.S. =
~ N(0,1)
where,
= % of the readers who owned a personal computer in a sample of 100 = 89%
n = sample size = 100
So, <u>test statistics</u> = 
= 3.196
<em>Now, at 0.02 level of significance the z table gives critical value of 2.054. Since our test statistics is more than the critical value of z so we have sufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis as it fall in the rejection region.</em>
Therefore, we conclude that percentage is actually more than the reported percentage which means we have sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the executive's claim.