Does this document support or contradict the argument made by the Samara assembly?

2 answers:

5 0

<span>This document supports the position of the Samara assembly. Both argue that property should be handed over to the peasants and wealthy landowners should not be paid for the seized property. Additionally, both documents imply that peasants work hard for little reward.
</span>

il63 [147K]3 years ago

3 0

In the resolution issued by the Voronezh peasant assembly a manifesto was issued proclaiming the gradual abolition of redemption payments for land allocations and the expansion of peasant bank funds. The government of that time would be able to satisfy the essential needs of the peasants. On the other hand, in the assembly issued by Samara the peasants want land and the prohibition of hired labor. We can say that there was no contradiction between the two documents, since the interest was to help the peasants.

You might be interested in

Marlene wakes up early in the morning and her room is fairly dark. She looks over and sees her shirt hanging on a hook. She know

jeka94

Answer: we see colour by light reflecting off our eyes, so it is likely that there was no light directly hitting her eyes, because she had just got up.

3 0

3 years ago

Describe the human rights violation of Xenophobia

balandron [24]

Answer:

Xenophobia is a dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries.

Explanation:

This is a violation to human rights because everybody has the right to there own religion. That's the first amendment.

6 0

3 years ago

Percy's learning difficulties become strengths in a different context. what seem to be attention problems enable him to be aware

fgiga [73]

Boi i i i i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

5 0

4 years ago

A police officer stops a car for speeding and conducts an illegal search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owne

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

The courts will likely exclude the evidence from court.

Explanation:

Exclusionary rule can be defined as rule which are legal, in which evidence collected without the warrant and consent from the owner can't be used against the owner in a court of law which is why police officers are been warned from abusing the constitutional rights because the rule are based on constitutional law which has to be adhere to .

Therefore the courts will likely exclude the evidence from court because the police officer conducts an illegal search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owner or operator.

4 0

4 years ago

Where were British forces ambushed?

guapka [62]

I believe they ambushed at Louisburg

7 0

3 years ago