Disruptive innovation are changes in products, services or processes that radically change an industry's rules of the game. By doing this, they are able to create a new market or change the value to an existing market. The disrupt the existing market and value by improving products or services.
Answer:
7 years (to the nearest year)
Explanation:
Given that;
A = amount
P= principal
t = time
r = rate
A =3P(given in the question)
Formula for compound interest;
A = P(1 + r)^t
Substituting values;
3P = P(1 + 18/100)^t
3P/P= (1.18)^t
3 = (1.18)^t
log 3 = t log 1.18
t = log 3/log 1.18
t = 0.4771/0.0719
t = 6.6 years
t = 7 years (to the nearest year)
Answer:
Legal but Unethical
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Gander's business conduct is Legal but Unethical. It is legal because since it is a developing country there is most likely no law against the amount that the company's must pay employees. On the other hand it is unethical because the company is taking advantage of the necessity of the workers and is paying them nonliving wages.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
D. organizational citizenship behavior.
Explanation:
In this scenario exemplified in the question, it can be said that Davy has all work behaviors except the behavior of organizational citizenship.
This behavior can be described as one that is not mandatory as part of the functional requirements of a job position, but an employee who presents organizational citizenship helps the company to promote a culture favorable to the maintenance of ethics and the development and performance of the organization as one all.
Any informal action by the worker that benefits the organization is part of the behavior of organizational citizenship. Some of these dimensions of behavior are altruism, loyalty, conscience, self-development, obedience, etc.
These behaviors are capable of promoting the well-being of the employee and the entire organization.
Answer: The answer is given below
Explanation:
My assessment of the Under Armour’s performance downturn in North America that first appeared in the fourth quarter of 2016 was that Under Armour’s 2016 downturn was caused as a result of the reduction in the sale and earnings outlook.
Also, the weakened demand that occurred in North America had a negative effect on demand and resulted in the company dropping from 25.7% in the first quarter, to 21.5% in the second quarter and about 15.6% in the third quarter.
