All categories

3 years ago

What is one reason that a brand may not want to get rid of a product that isnt meeting goals?

Business

2 answers:

Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Customer Loyalty

Explanation:

Apex

Alika [10]3 years ago

3 0

The only reason a company doesn't want to get rid of a product which is not paying off or meeting goals is, that product is the face of the company. And if the company wants to get rid of that, it will lose its base.

Suppose if KFC removes zinger burger from its product line, it will lose its base popularity. Even though if Zinger is not bought by much people, KFC cannot stop its production. Because this is actually the face of KFC.

You might be interested in

Overhead Variance (Over- or Underapplied), Closing to Cost of Goods Sold

Bogdan [553]

Answer:

This question has two requirements answer of each requiremnt is given below.

Dispose of the overhead variance by adjusting Cost of Goods Sold. Adjusted COGS $____

Applied Overhead = 532,000 * 80% =$ 425,600

This show that overhead are over apllied, so

Adjusted COGS = $1,890,000 - (425,600 -423,600)

= $ 1,888,000

Calculate the overhead variance for the year. $____

Overhead variance = Applied Overhead - Actual Overhead

= 425,600 -423,600

= $ 2000 (Favorable variance)

4 0

3 years ago

A major difference between high-assertiveness and low-assertiveness cultures is that people in low-assertiveness cultures tend t

Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

B. False

Explanation:

People with high assertiveness respect themselves because they are very willing to defend their interests. They can freely express their thoughts and feelings. Since they are aware of their rights and others', they always work to resolve conflicts. But cultures with low assertiveness tend to allow others to manipulate them while displaying low self-esteem.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Greer Manufacturing purchases property that includes land, buildings and equipment for $4.7 million. The company pays $185,000 i

nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The journal entry is shown below:

Land A/c Dr $1,459,920

Equipment A/c Dr $2,085,600

Building A/c Dr $1,668,480

To Cash A/c $2,607,000 ($5,214,000 × 50%)

To Notes payable A/c $2,607,000 ($5,214,000 × 50%)

(Being purchase of property is recorded)

The total property cost would be

= $4,700,000 + $185,000 + $218,000 + $111,000

= $5,214,000

Estimated value of land = $5,214,000 × 28% = $1,459,920

Estimated value of building = $5,214,000 × 40% = $2,085,600

Estimated value of equipment = $5,214,000 × 32% = $1,668,480

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose a firm has an annual budget of $200,000 in wages and salaries, $75,000 in materials, $30,000 in new equipment, $20,000 i

Molodets [167]

Answer:

The firm will need additional revenue of $90,000 to earn normal profit(zero economic profit)

Explanation:

Normal profit equals zero economic profit or when total revenue equals

the addition of explicit cost and Implicit cost. Implicit cost is the opportunity cost.

Explicit cost = $200,000 + $75,000 + $30,000 + $20,000 + $35,000

=$360,000

Implicit cost is $90,000

Total revenue is $360,000

Normal profit = $360,000 - ($360,000 + $90,000)

$360,000 - $450,000

-$90,000.

This means the firm will need additional revenue of $90,000 to earn normal profit(zero economic profit)

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST ITS URGENT

julia-pushkina [17]

Okay what’s the problem

8 0

3 years ago