1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OleMash [197]
3 years ago
8

13. Given the following historical data and weights of .5, .3, and .2, what is the three-period weighted moving average forecast

for period 5? Period Value 1 138 2 142 3 148 4 144 a. 144.2 b. 144.8 c. 144.6 d. 143 e. 144
Mathematics
1 answer:
Ostrovityanka [42]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

b. 144.8

Step-by-step explanation:

When calculating the moving average estimate of an observation , each of the observations are usually computed with the same weighted . In some cases, it is  beneficial to assign different  weight on the observations  such that the observation closer to the time period being forecast, has higher weight.  This is refer to as weighted moving average technique. The sum of the individual weight in a weighted moving average technique must equal to 1.

The three-period weighted moving average forecast for period 5 = 144*0.5 + 148 *0.3 + 142 *0.2 =  144.8

You might be interested in
What are different ways to add two rational numbers and get a negative
makkiz [27]
If the sum is negative or if the signs are different and the negative has a biger absoulute value.
5 0
4 years ago
Before ordering food for a company barbecue the president took a poll. She asked people if they would eat the ribs, hamburgers,
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

The complete question is as shown in the attached figure 1

The Venn diagram is the attached figure 2

Let: R⇒ribs , H⇒hamburgers  and  C⇒corn

People would eat all three = 53

People would eat only R and H = 56 - 53 = 3

People would eat only C and H = 54 - 53 = 1

People would eat only R and C = 55 - 53 = 2

People would eat only H = 60 - (53+3+1) = 60 - 57 = 3

People would eat only R = 59 - (53+3+2) = 59 - 58 = 1

People would eat only C = 56 - (53+1+2) = 0

See Vinn diagram.

=========================================================

a. How many people did not want any of these foods?

people did not want any of these foods = 64 - (53+3+1+2+3+1) = 1

b. How many people would eat ribs but not corn?

people would eat ribs but not corn = 1+3 = 4

c. How many people would eat something as long as it was not a hamburger?

people would eat something as long as it was not a hamburger= 1+2 = 3

d. How many people would eat only corn?

people would eat only corn = 0

e. How many people would eat exactly two foods?

people would eat exactly two foods = 1 + 2 + 1

6 0
3 years ago
What is 10 times 10. ?
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

=100

Step-by-step explanation:

10×10= 100

Simpler version- 1×1= 1 and you just add the two 0's to the 1, that gives you 100

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
En la casa de Juan, van a pedir pizza para la comida, pero cuando la van a pedir se dan cuenta que deben pedirla por perímetro o
Degger [83]

Responder:

La pizza con un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande ¿verdad?

Explicación paso a paso:

Deja que la pizza tenga forma circular.

Sea el área de la pizza = πd² / 4 y;

Perímetro de la pizza = πd

d es el diámetro de la pizza

Si la madre dice que el que tiene un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande, para estar seguros necesitamos obtener el diámetro de la pizza. La de mayor diámetro será la pizza más grande.

P = 100cm

100 = πd

d = 100 / π

d = 100 / 3,14

d = 31,85 cm

El diámetro de la pizza mamá es de 31,85 cm.

Si el padre dice que el que tiene un área de 100 cm² es más grande, obtengamos también el diámetro para estar seguros.

A = πd² / 4

100 = πd² / 4

400 = πd²

d² = 400 / π

d² = 400 / 3,14

d² = 127,39

d = √127,39

d = 11,29 cm

Por lo tanto, el diámetro de la pizza padre es de 11,29 cm.

Dado que el diámetro de la pizza madre es mayor que el de esa, la pizza con un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande, lo que demuestra que la madre tiene razón.

6 0
3 years ago
49°<br> Solve for 42.<br> 2 = [?]<br> 44/62
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

∠2 = 41°

Step-by-step explanation:

∠2 + 49° + 90° = 180°

∠2 + 139° = 180°

∠2 = 180° - 139°

∠2 = 41°

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If sin(x)=0.3090 , what is the approximate value of csc(x)?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following equations shows the correct form of the equation x 2 + 10x + 25 = 16 if the zero product property is to b
    8·1 answer
  • Help!!!!<br> Select the type of equations.<br> consistent<br> inconsistent<br> equivalent
    9·1 answer
  • URGENT! PLEASE HELP! 50 POINTS!
    14·1 answer
  • 1/4 and 1 1/2 times as much
    9·1 answer
  • What is the area and perimeter of a triangle with base of 10cm, height of 8cm, and third side of 6cm
    15·1 answer
  • Please refer to the attached image for the question/problem.
    6·1 answer
  • Find f(3) for the polynomial function F(x)=x^3-9x^2+5x-2
    13·1 answer
  • For what value of q is the equation -13(q + 4) = 7q + 16
    8·1 answer
  • I need help please as soon as possible thanks
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!