Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
For
substitute in the formula and solve for F
<h3>
Answer: D. Kira used published data that is quantitative.</h3>
The published data refers to the government census info being published online. She did not do an observational study because she didn't go to each household herself (rather let the census workers do that task).
The data is quantitative because she is looking at the number of people living in homes in her city. Quantitative data is simply dealing with quantities or numbers. Contrast this with qualitative data that talks about something like color choice.
x + x + 1 + x + 2 = 5x - 29
Combine like terms.
3x + 3 = 5x - 29
Subtract 3x from both sides.
3 = 2x - 29
Add 29 to both sides.
32 = 2x
Divide both sides by 2.
16 = x
<h3>The first digit is 16.</h3><h3>The second digit is 17.</h3><h3>The third digit is 18.</h3>
mu = 1100 = population mean
sigma = 275 = population standard deviation
x = 1400 = raw score
z = z score
z = (x-mu)/sigma
z = (1400-1100)/(275)
z = 300/275
z = 1.0909090909091 approximately
z = 1.09
Convention is to round to two decimal places so that you can use a Z table to look up the area under the curve (which helps determine probability).
The positive z score is due to Paula's raw score being above the mean.