Your question isn't very specific but the answer I got was: Strategic Thinking.
Source: http://time.com/money/4328180/most-valuable-career-skills/
This can really be answered by others. This question is asked direcly to YOU. If you are unsure of the identification portion, it helps to google the terms, and based off what you looked up, you should be able to determine if your response fits in with any of these. Best of lock to you!
One reason it was a health threat is it caused teeth to become ground down which would then lead to infections. The same was true with their eyes and lungs, sand would be blown into their eyes or inhaled into their lungs and then could cause infections.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
Front-loading is the process scheduling presidential primaries early in the primary season.
Option a
<u>Explanation: </u>
Front-loading is defined as a phenomenon or process of multiple states opting to schedule their own elections at the beginning or the ‘front’ of the election season. Hence, the front-loading as more and more states schedule their primaries in the early primary season of an election cycle.
The other options are nowhere near the description for this process, hence making option ‘a’ the correct answer. Front-loading is usually opted for so that the states could have a greater say and influence on the process, as it helps them get elected earlier usually making the elections occur in January/February, as opposed to states that have it occur in the months of June as the races tend to be over by then.
