Answer:
<u>India.</u>
Explanation:
India is a country with an emerging economy that attracts a lot of investment due to its significant annual economic growth, government incentives, low taxes and little red tape.
The country stands out as the most populous democracy in the world, and despite having a global mentality for business and high investment rates, the second largest population in the world presents serious social problems, such as the caste system, which prevents Indians from having a better quality of life. There is also corruption, social inequality, religious and border disputes. All of these factors contribute to the fact that despite high investments and growth, India is a country marked by social inequality and extreme poverty for a large part of the population, which configures little access to consumer goods for most Indians.
Answer:
The option which is an example of a debt funding source can be banks, credit unions, or any external lender.
Explanation:
- Debt funding is when a company raises money by marketing bonds, bills and notes, etc. to the investors
- It differs from equity financing which is selling shares of the company.
- Debt funding must be paid back at an previously agreed date.
- If the business goes under, then the lenders have more rights on the property that will be liquidated than the share holders.
Answer:
D) $150,000
Explanation:
Insurance proceeds that are not reinvested in replacing damaged property are taxed. Apparently Prime corporation didn't reinvest into replacing the property, so this transaction should be taxed as a property sale. Prime received $400,000 for the building with a $350,000 basis which results in a net gain = $50,000.
The other $100,000 were given as replacement income and therefore should be taxed as such.
So the total taxable amount = $50,000 + $100,000 = $150,000
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
No, we can’t say
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.
We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;
As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.
Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living
