Answer:
one of them was the common people and the other were the so called "elites"
Hello there!
A weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that ....
A) It could not levy taxes..
This was terrible because it was seen as a pointless document because it was too soft...
The rest of the choices are incorrect because recently took this subject, so I can assure you it is A!
:) Hope this helped
Answer:
self-serving bias
Explanation:
The scenario being described is an example of a self-serving bias. This is mainly when someone blames other people or factors for the bad things that have happened to them. In this scenario, the girls are blaming the umpire as the reason that they lost the match, but in reality the girls most likely lost the match because they did not play as good as the oppossing team. For the team it is much easier to blame the umpire instead of accepting that the reason for losing was due to their own lack of practice.
Answer:
random assignment
Explanation:
Random assignment is an experimental technique that seeks to form random and fully randomized experimental groups in relation to the treatments presented in the research. This type of technique prevents the formation of "combined groups" that show the differences to each other and can generate a comprehensive result on the research, thus the random formation of diverse groups that can represent a much larger and different population.
An example of this can be seen in the question above, where the researcher decides the formation of the group that will receive the medicine and the group that will receive the placebo, completely randomly.
Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
