Answer:
C₈H₈O₃
Explanation:
The empirical formula is the simplest whole-number ratio of atoms in a compound.
The ratio of atoms is the same as the ratio of moles.
So, our job is to calculate the molar ratio of C:H:O.
Assume 100 g of the compound.
1. Calculate the mass of each element.
Then we have 63.15 g C, 5.30 g H, and 31.55 g O.
2. Calculate the moles of each element
3. Calculate the molar ratio of the elements
Divide each number by the smallest number of moles
C:H:O = 5.258:5.258:1.972 = 2.667:2.666:1
4. Multiply by a number to make each ratio close to an integer
Multiply the ratios by three.
2.667:2.666:1 = 8.000:8.000:3 ≈ 8:8:3
5. Write the empirical formula
EF = C₈H₈O₃
You're oxidising agent will be reduced. In the molecule MnO4-, Mn has and oxidation number of +9 and in MnO2 it is +4, therefore its oxidation number has reduced, therefore Mn is reduced, therefore it is the oxidant/oxidising agent.
Answer:
Synthesis
Explanation:
Reaction Given:
NH₃+ HCI ------> NH₄Cl
Type of reaction = ?
Solution:
Look at the reactants and products of the reaction to know the type of reaction
NH₃+ HCI ------> NH₄Cl
In this reaction two reactant combine and give 1 products.
Reactant of the reaction
NH₃ = Ammonia
HCl = Hydrochloric acid
Product of the reaction
NH₄Cl = Ammonium chloride
So,
That ammonia (NH₃) react with Hydrochloric acid (HCl) and produces salt.
in this reaction NH₃ is a week base and take a proton from HCl and form ammonium ion and Cl ion. these two ions in combine form gives a salt called ammonium chloride.
Type of Reaction:
This is type of synthesis reaction, in which NH₃ and HCl combine and form a new compound that is ammonium chloride salt (NH₄Cl). As the synthesis reaction is that reaction in which two are more compounds or molecules combine and form a new compound.
Because it either acids or base
Answer:
Mrs. Nogaki is right because Mr. Holmes’s BBQ produces 3x more CO2 for each mole of fuel burned.
Explanation:
Now Mrs. Nogaki has already figured out the chemical combustion reaction behind the operation of her BBQ. It is pertinent to reproduce it here.
CH4(g) + 2O2(g)→CO2(g) +2H2O(g)
She already has this figured out but Mr. Holmes doesn't have any chemical reaction equation to back his claims. Let us help him with the correct combustion equation for propane.
C3H8(g) + 5O2(g) + 3CO2(g) + 4H2O(g)
We can clearly see from the reaction equation that Mr. Holmes BBQ produces three times more carbon IV oxide than Mr. Nogaki's BBQ so Mr. Nogaki was right in her claim after all.
Hence the answer!