<span>Answer: Storming
There five stages of team development: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. The stage or phase where conflict and competition arises and at its greatest is storming. This is because the members of the group have understood the tasks in the forming stage so when you deliver<span> your report to the group, people begin asking questions. Asking questions happen during storming. </span></span>
Answer:
Prioritized list
Explanation:
Step 3 of the decision-making process is to identify alternatives or options. Therefore, finding many options so that the individual cannot make any wrong decision during the time of choosing the right option. If the person identifies the various options, he or she can choose the most optimal list. In that case, testing, or brainstorming activity cannot help to proceed with alternatives. Prioritizing the list will be helpful to approach in 3rd step to find the best possible options. Therefore, option D is the answer.
Answer:
The letter D. Assumption of the risk.
Explanation:
I believe the Best-of-the-Rest company is reliable for the quality of the products it produces and resells. Trading food is very dangerous because it needs a very close surveillance by the owner and supervision. A part of a mouse ear at the bottom of the can may have been overlooked in the packaging. Alternatively, it may have been posed by someone with bad intentions to undermine the company's credibility. Everything is possible.
Answer:
A. 1/3 computers
B. 0.6 computers
Explanation:
A. The opportunity cost incurred by the US to make cars is the number of computers it would have to give up to make a car.
The US can either make 12 cars or 4 computers. For every car made therefore the US forgoes;
= 4/12
= 1/3 computers.
B. The same logic applies to Japan. They can either make 10 cars or 6 computers.
Their opportunity cost for cars is therefore;
= 6/10
= 0.6 computers
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
