1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
14

Explain the differences between civil and criminal trials and the participants in each. Your response should be at least 200 wor

ds.
Law
1 answer:
ExtremeBDS [4]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The American legal system addresses the wrongdoings that people commit with two different types of cases: civil and criminal. Crimes are generally offenses against the state (even if the immediate harm is done to an individual), and are accordingly prosecuted by the state. Civil cases on the other hand, typically involve disputes between individuals regarding the legal duties and responsibilities they owe to one another. These cases are adjudicated through civil lawsuits. Although there is some overlap, there are several ways in which you can tell the differences between a criminal case and a civil case.

Criminal Case vs. Civil Case: Distinctions

Here are some of the key differences between a criminal case and a civil case:

Crimes are considered offenses against the state, or society as a whole

Criminal offenses and civil offenses are generally different in terms of their punishment

The standard of proof is also very different in a criminal case versus a civil case

Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury

A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney

The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable

Crimes are Offenses Against the State

That means that even though one person might murder a particular person, the murder itself is considered an offense to everyone in society. Accordingly, crimes against the state are prosecuted by the state, and the prosecutor (not the victim) files the case in court as a representative of the state. If it were a civil case, then the wronged party would file the case.

Differences in Punishment

Civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something, known as injunctions. Note that a criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishments in the form of fines. In general, because criminal cases have greater consequences - the possibility of jail and even death - criminal cases have many more protections in place and are harder to prove.

The Standard of Proof

Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way). The difference in standards exists because civil liability is considered less blameworthy and because the punishments are less severe.

Jury Trials

Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a judge.

The Right to an Attorney

A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney, and if they can't afford one, the state must provide an attorney. Defendants in a civil case don't have the right to an attorney, so if they can't afford one, they'll have to represent themselves.

Defendant's Rights and Protection

The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable (such as the protection against illegal searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment). Many of these well known protections aren't available to a defendant in a civil case.

The Same Conduct Can Result in Civil and Criminal Liability

Although criminal and civil cases are treated very differently, many people often fail to recognize that the same conduct can result in both criminal and civil liability. Perhaps one of the most famous examples of this is the OJ Simpson trial. The same conduct led to a murder trial (criminal) and a wrongful death trial (civil).

In part because of the different standards of proof, there wasn't enough evidence for a jury to decide that OJ Simpson was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the criminal murder case. In the civil trial, however, the jury found enough evidence to conclude that OJ Simpson wrongfully caused his wife's death by a "preponderance of the evidence".

Get Legal Help to Better Understand Criminal Cases vs. Civil Cases

As noted, there are times when you can be exposed to both criminal and civil liability for the same act. However, only criminal charges can result in a prison sentence. That's why it's important to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney if you've been charged with a crime to evaluate the evidence in your case and to ensure that all of your rights are protected.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
2. What happened to savings in the United States? How did consumers contribute to this change?
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

What happened to savings in the United States?

Explanation:

The saving rate went from 10% savings rate to a negative savings rate. Consumers did this by binged buying items. Consumers would buy so many things that that weren't necessary, consumers supersized everything they had, instead of saving.

4 0
3 years ago
What does it mean when a murder is justified?
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

well if its for self defense or for the stand your ground law

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Magnetism can sometimes be induced in an iron object by:
quester [9]
The answer would be all of the above, because they all involve contact, which provokes magnetism
7 0
4 years ago
Under the retributive system, the reason we punish is for the greater good of society.
erastova [34]
The answer is : False
5 0
3 years ago
In Sara's suit against Tim, their attorneys present the case to a judge and jury. The jury renders an advisory verdict. The judg
Leto [7]

Answer: a summary jury trial

Explanation:

In Sara's suit against Tim, their attorneys present the case to a judge and jury. The jury renders an advisory verdict. The judge then meets with the parties to encourage a settlement. This is a summary jury trial.

Summary jury trial is also referred to as an alternative dispute resolution. It is usually conducted in a single day, it is economical and typically used to settle civil disputes. ​It is a binding jury trial that is presided over by a judge and done before a panel that is usually made up of about six jurors.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you have held a learner's license for more than three months, you may NOT drive _____.
    8·2 answers
  • Which amendments to the constitution does not address or guarantee voting rights?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the goal of any traffic stop by law enforcement?
    14·1 answer
  • the independent of the correlation with the environment answer in 5-20 sentences with barak obama and michael
    14·1 answer
  • 31. "Stand Your Ground" means what? (Read answer choices carefully)
    8·2 answers
  • The estimated cost of completing a full time student at a post secendary institution is called
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ! need for today<br><br><br>PLEASE EXPLAIN
    14·2 answers
  • Match each description to the appropriate Enlightenment text.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the impeachment process and removal for federal officials according to the united states constitution?.
    15·1 answer
  • Does the WTO support tariffs?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!