All categories

4 years ago

7.1 + 16.04 – .2 = ?

2 answers:

8 0

The answer is 22.94 because of reasons and math and decimals and stuffy I'm not going to go in to detail somebody else can because I'm not with the math stuff

zubka84 [21]4 years ago

7 0

7.1+16.04-0.2
=23.14-0.2
=22.94
This is your answer.

You might be interested in

Please help Me solve this ASAP

Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

i dont know it looks complicated

Step-by-step explanation:

copy paste then search it, you might find it.

8 0

3 years ago

Calculate the distance between the points C = (0,-2) and L= (-4, 1) in the coordinate plane. Give an exact answer. (not a decima

schepotkina [342]

Answer: 5

Step-by-step explanation:

$\sqrt{(-4-0)^2 + (1-(-2))^2}=5$

7 0

2 years ago

I need to Match each equation that represents each situation.

almond37 [142]

Step-by-step explanation:

this is quite easy, when you use just common sense and identify the right numbers and variable names.

they is nothing special needed, you don't even need to create the equations yourself.

$4.99 per pound. buys b pounds and pays $14.95.

14.95 = 4.99 × b

$4.99 per pound. buys b pounds and pays c.

this is exactly the same as before, just that this time the total amount is not given as a constant but as a variable.

c = 4.99 × b

d dollars per pound. buys b pounds and pays t.

the same as the 2 cases before, just now everything is a variable. no more constants, but otherwise the completely same structure and method.

t = d × b

earned $275, which is $45 more than Noah ("n").

$275 = n + $45

earned m dollars, which is $45 more than Noah ("n").

m = n + $45

earned m dollars, which is y dollars more than Noah (we are asked that Noah's earnings are now called "v").

here your teacher made a mistake.

sure, the only remaining answer is

v = m + y

but it is not correct. given the names of the prime and associated variables the correct answer would be

m = v + y or v = m - y

7 0

2 years ago

Does this graph represent a function? Why or why not?

Lunna [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

B. Yes, because it passes the vertical line test, is the answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function f(x) = 2^x. She makes these

GalinKa [24]

General Idea:

Domain is the values of x which gives a defined output to the function, and Range is the values of y that we get by substituting domain values of x. For the function f(x) = a^x, where a > 0, the domain will be all real numbers and range will be all values greater than 0. That is the graph will be very close to x-axis but will never touch it.

Applying the concept:

From the attached table, we can notice that as x increases infinitely, the y-values are continually doubled for each single increase in x and as x decreases infinitely, the y-values are continually halved for each single decrease in x.

Option 1: "Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled".

Option 1 is INCORRECT because Statement 1 is TRUE & CORRECT.

Option 2: "Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved".

Option 2 is INCORRECT because Statement 2 is TRUE & CORRECT.

Option 3: "The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of the integers"

Option 3 is INCORRECT because, the range will be always greater than 0, because irrespective of how many times y is halved for each single decrease in x, the y will still be a positive fraction and won't be a negative.

Option 4: "The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers"

Option 4 is CORRECT because y value will be positive irrespective of whatever x we substitute in the function.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers