Answer:
Equilibrium price, p = 2.5
Equilibrium Quantity, Q = 22.5
Explanation:
The equation is:
Qd = 30 - 3p
Qs = 10 + 5p
At equilibrium, Quantity demanded equals quantity supplied
Equate Qd = Qs to find equilibrium price
30 - 3p = 10 + 5p
30 - 10 = 5p + 3p
20 = 8p
p = 20/8
P = 2.5
Substitute equilibrium price into Qd and Qs equation to find equilibrium Quantity
Qd = 30 - 3p
= 30 - 3(2.5)
= 30 - 7.5
= 22.5
Qs = 10 + 5p
= 10 + 5(2.5)
= 10 + 12.5
= 22.5
Therefore,
Equilibrium price, p = 2.5
Equilibrium Quantity, Q = 22.5
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the missing part
answer: Pd = 1658 , Qd = 42
Explanation:
The monopolist will choose a discount price of ( Pd ) = 1658 and sell 42 units of the good in the discount market
since the standard price is at $1800 and the Qm ( standard monopoly quantity) is at 200 for the Monopoly to be profitable the amount of good to be sold to customers with reservation prices greater than or equal to standard price should be greater than the good offered at discount price and also the discount price after using a coupon should be lower than the standard price (Pm)
Answer:
Gross profit= 131,500
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Last quarter, RP Enterprises earned $220,000 in sales revenue and had $90,000 cost of goods sold (at standard). RP also experienced these variances: Materials price: $2,400 F Materials quantity: $1,400 U Labor price: $2,000 U Labor quantity: $1,000 F Overhead: $1,500 F
To calculate the cost of goods sold, we use actaul costs and quantity of direct labor and direct materials. Therefore, the only estimated cost is overhead.
Gross profit= 220,000 - 90,000 + 1,500= 131,500
Answer:
The correct option is (d)
Explanation:
Ethics is considered above law as law requires just compliance of laws, rules and regulations. Ethics on the other hand establishes a standard of moral conduct. Being mere legal does not mean that something is ethical. Ethical responsibilities are not codified as it is expected from businesses to follow the same.
Here, Marshall, though complied with legal frameworks, he failed to fulfill his ethical obligations by using low-grade products that could harm the general public in future.
