Answer:
reality shock.
Explanation:
In occupational term, Reality shock refers to a situation when new workers experience a massive difference between the 'expectation' of what their job would be, and the 'actual condition' of their job.
From the example above,
Angela is most likely only been imagining about the 'good part' of being a teacher during her preparation years (communicating with the students, helping the students reach their full potential, socializing with parents and other teacher , etc).
But Angela never realize that the actual job of being a teacher actually involve a long and tedious repetitive duties (such as grading papers and preparing lessons).
Unconscious biases can make it more difficult to find, engage, and graduate students. It could inhibit innovation or obstruct efforts to diversify the leadership pipeline in professional settings.
Unconscious biases are attitudes we have toward particular groups that we hold without being consciously aware of them. Even if they strive to treat all students fairly, teachers may harbour unintentional biases about them.
Teaching and learning can be enhanced and classroom inclusiveness can be fostered by teachers by being aware of typical biases towards student identity groupings.
Unconscious biases have an impact on employees' experiences overall and their morale when it is not addressed. These employees could feel isolated and be less willing to voice their opinions. Negative bias may make someone more likely to begin looking for new employment.
Learn more unconscious biases here:
brainly.com/question/10868271
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer here is A: the fact that the broadcast speech was only available to a limited audience.
Explanation:
When talking about freedom of speech vs. public interest, what judges need to evaluate, when making a ruling about a situation such as this, is how much the public is being affected and to what extent, as in number of people actually being negatively affected, in order to overcome freedom of speech. Freedom of speech, is a right covered by the Constitution, and its protection sometimes supersedes other rights. However, when the affectation is too broad, or can cause damage to other protected rights, depending on how the consequences affect people, and the number of people being affected, then a judge may see fit to curtail, or limit, the freedom of speech. In this case, because it was a limited broadcast, and there is the principle that these viewers could simply decide not to watch, or simply stop paying their subscription, then freedom of speech takes precedence since the damage is limited by numbers.
I believe the answer is: Can
Price controls refers to the government regulation that being done to limit the maximum or minimum selling price for products that can be sold in the market. When this regulation doe snot exist, the prices would be fully depended by market pressures which created by the power of demand and supply.
Answer:
In the case of agitation after taking LSD the LPN/LVP can give a Benzodiazepine to the patient.
Explanation:
LSD or lysergic acid diethylamide is a hallucinogen that causes auditory and visual hallucinations, where users see or hear things that are not real.
After ascertaining that there is no danger of violence on the part of patients to others and to themselves, supportive reassurance (or "talking down") is the basic treatment for patients who have ingested LSD.
However depending on the severity of the case (i.e whether the patient is a long-term user), other cause of action like supportive care, ergotism therapy and consultations can be employed.
