<u>Answer:
</u>
They can and do change cultural norms, values, symbols, and institutions, and the ability to contest this is known as agency.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The leaders involved in state domination are often seen to be seeking power through various means and forms.
- In order to have access to forms of power, people in such disciplines contest with each other and achieve the authority to exercise the power dispensed by the post.
- When such people secure power, they become the agents of change and often change things and ideas that are in prevalence.
Answer:
Whites used the policy of apartheid to hold on to their power, wealth, and control.
Whites continued to control South Africa even after South Africa gained its independence.
Explanation:
The whites in South Africa use apartheid laws as a tool for domination over the majority who were Blacks.
The apartheid laws were discriminating and bias in nature, they gave a total say to the whites in South Africa while they oppressed the blacks.
The domination of up to 80 percent of the land in South Africa by whites who were the minority compared to blacks who were the majority clear gives evidence that the apartheid rules were working for the welfare of the white South Africans.
After independence, the whites in south Africa had the Apartheid rule in place to guard their intrests, this made the whites have authority over the black population hence, the whites continues to controll South Africa.
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
It was George Washington that established the precedent that the president would play a prominent role in foreign affairs. This is mainly due to the fact that he was the 1st President of the United States of America from 1789 to 1797 and one of the Founding Fathers that created and signed the constitution.
C.a person's freedom tocommunicate your opinions and ideas through action and public display
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
