1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
4 years ago
15

What is greater -5 or -8?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Brut [27]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

-5 has more value than -8

Step-by-step explanation:


You might be interested in
Do you agree or disagree that we should study number systems in computing? Why are Binary and Hexadecimal so important in comput
yulyashka [42]

Answer: Yes, I agree we should study number system in computing.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hexadecimal numbers can be easily converted to binary numbers.

4 0
3 years ago
10%of what number is 14
Murrr4er [49]
I think 140 is the answer
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A map has a scale of 66 miles to the inch. How far apart on the map are two cities that in reality are 198 miles apart?
lesya [120]
They are 3 inches apart
5 0
4 years ago
A cylinder shaped water tank has a diameter of 8 m and a height of 20 m. What volume of water does the tank contain when it is 6
dimaraw [331]
The volume of a cylinder is the area of the base times the height
area of the base: 3.14*4² (diameter is 8, so radius is 4)
height: 20
3.14*4²*20=1004.8
60% of 1004.8=602.88
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the matrix <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A_%7B4x4%7D%2C%20det%28A%29%20%3D%20-2" id="TexFormula1" title="A_{4x4}, d
Lerok [7]

We found a counterexample, so the statement is false.

<h3>Is the statement true?</h3>

Let's use the matrix:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]

This is a 4x4 matrix with determinant equal to -2.

The inverse matrix is:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1/2&0&0&0\\0&-1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\ 0&0&0&-1 \end{array}\right]

If we multiply it by 2, we get:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&0&0&0\\0&-2&0&0\\0&0&-2&0\\ 0&0&0&-2 \end{array}\right]

The adjoint of that is the original matrix, actually:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-2&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right]

Which we already know, has a determinant of -2.

So the statement is false, as we found a counterexample.

If you want to learn more about matrices:

brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In don't understand how to work this problem out
    10·1 answer
  • The measure of side BC =<br><br> Please answer need fast
    7·1 answer
  • A dolphin was swimming 20 feet below the surface of the water. It descended 8 feet to catch a fish. What integer represents its
    9·1 answer
  • What is the value of x?<br><br> Enter your answer in the box.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement about these two triangles is true
    7·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP! <br> 20 points <br> Step by step is you can
    6·1 answer
  • Which fraction has the greatest value?<br> 12/13, 19/20, 8/9, or 77/99
    7·2 answers
  • Solve 3-5 = 9. (1 point)<br> Math
    14·1 answer
  • You and your family are planning a vacation of a lifetime around the world that will cost $25,000. You borrowed this amount from
    9·1 answer
  • Please show your work! I have 3 more of these, and I want to be able to do them by myself.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!