Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
Answer:
Carter believes that the abuse of women and girls is the most serious human rights violation because religious books, such as the Bible, Old Testament, New Testament, Quran, and other sacred scriptures, have been misconstrued by men in positions of power in synagogues, churches, and mosques. Women are not permitted to serve as priests, pastors, or deacons in the church, or as military chaplains. A woman who is teaching in a classroom is unable to do so if there is a guy there. This is a widespread issue because men have the power to declare that if women aren't equal in God's eyes, why should I regard them as equals myself?
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
Answer: Strict Scrutiny
Explanation:
Strict Scrutiny can be defined as the highest form of judicial review,
which court uses to determine whether some certain laws are within the constitution. Strict scrutiny is widely and mostly used by the competent court of law when the government is sued by the accuser. The law also establishes a ban on some contents, which includes writing of threats to the President of the United States.
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.