1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
insens350 [35]
3 years ago
13

Why would an American company downplay its American origin while operating in another country?

Business
1 answer:
Tom [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer would be option D, Strategically downplaying the country of origin effects.

Explanation:

The meaning of downplaying is make something appear less important than it actually is. So if a company is operating in another country, not in his own country, then downplaying the country of origin has better effects than promoting or giving importance to home country while operating in other country. This is strategically very important and has bigger effects. For example, if the American company is operating in Japan, then the culture, the values of Japanese society is much different than American society, so if American company will not downplay it American origin, and try to impose its own culture and values in Japanese workplace, it would have a bad effect on the whole system. So strategically downplaying the country of origin effects a lot.

You might be interested in
Wages are an example of<br> that are involved in running a business.
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

brainliest pls

Explanation:

Wages are part of the expenses that are involved in running a business, and add value to the employee in honor of his principal protected note or net investment.

6 0
3 years ago
Various financial data for the past two years follow. LAST YEAR THIS YEAR Output: Sales $ 200,000 $ 220,000 Input: Labor 30,000
Gelneren [198K]

Answer and Explanation:

1.Total productivity = output/input

For last year

Output = 200,000

Input = 30000+35000+5000+50000+2000

= 122000 dollars

Output/input = 200000/122000 = 1.64

For current year

Output = 220000

Input = 40000+45000+6000+50000+3000

= 144000

Output/input = 220000/144000

= 1.53

Percentage change = [(1.53-1.64)/11.64} x 100

= -6.70

Partial measure of labor

For last year

Output = 200000

Input = 30000

Output/input = 200000/30000 = 6.67

For current last

Output = 220000

Input = 40000

Output/input = 220000/40000

= 5.50

Percentage change = (5.5-6.67)/6.67*100

= -17.54%

Percentage measure of raw material

For last year

Output = 200000

Input = 35000

Output/input = 200000/35000 = 5.71

For current year

Output = 220000

Input = 45000

Output/input = 220000/45000 = 4.89

Percentage change = (4.88-5.71)/5.71 * 100

= -14.36%

Percentage measure of capital

For last year

Output = 200000

Input = 50000

Output/input = 200000/50000 = 4

Current year

Output = 220000

Input = 50000

Output/input = 220000/50000 = 4.40

Percentage change = (4.40 - 4.00)/4.40 x 100

= 10%

The overall percentage change for total productivity is negative, this tells us that productivity is on a decline. Partial measure of labor and raw material is decreasing but that of capital is increasing

6 0
4 years ago
If retained earnings decreased during the year, and no dividends were paid, which of the following statements must be true? (A)
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

The answer is (A) Expenses for the year exceeded revenues.

Explanation:

If retained earnings decreased during the year, and no dividends were paid this would mean the company would have made a loss in the financial period.  A loss occurs when expenses  for the year exceed revenues.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following does the aggregate expenditure macroeconomic model seek to​ explain?   A. inflation B. the business cycle
horsena [70]

Answer:

B. the business cycle

Explanation:

Macroeconomics studies how an economy behaves, this means, how the markets work on a large scale by analyzing inflation, economic growth, DCP, etc.

I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!

4 0
3 years ago
how will the demand for gucci shoes change today, if the government decides to tax designer shoes next year?
Masteriza [31]
The demand for gucci shoes would increase drastically if the government decides to tax designer shoes next year so the people don’t have to pay for the taxes.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nick has set up his steel factory near a community lake. The waste from his factory is directly thrown in the lake and is causin
    5·2 answers
  • A ski company in Vail owns two ski shops, one on the west side and one on the east side of Vail. Ski hat sales data (in dollars)
    5·1 answer
  • In doing "aggregate planning" for a firm producing paint, the aggregate planners would most likely deal with:
    12·1 answer
  • The LaGrange Corporation had the following budgeted sales for the first half of the current year: Cash Sales Credit Sales Januar
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of licensing?a- An Indian automobile manufacturing company buys engines from a Japanese man
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a benefit of outsourcing? a. It makes employees self-reliant. b. It helps a firm meet its expansion ne
    6·1 answer
  • Tax that you pay when making a profit from selling a house is an example of:
    6·2 answers
  • You just signed a business consulting contract with one of your clients. The client will pay you $50,000 a year for five years f
    14·1 answer
  • How do life expectancy at birth and political freedom change the relative ranking of living standards that real GDP per person​
    9·1 answer
  • n 2012, alder inc. (seller) and dell, inc. (buyer) signed a long-term sales contract that provided for cashier's check payments
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!