Answer:
x = 
Step-by-step explanation:
2x-6+3=6x-5
2x-3=6x-5
2x-6x=-5+3
-4x=-2
x=.5or 1/2
The answer would be v = -1
Hey there!!
Jason = 800 + Paul
Alex = Jason - 150
How much more does Alex have the Paul?
Let's take the equation of Alex
... Alex = Jason - 150
... Add 150 on both sides
... Alex + 150 = Jason
Now we have the equation for Jason,
... Jason = 800 + Paul , and we got Alex + 150 = Jason
... Now let's plug in the values
... Alex + 150 = 800 + Paul
Subtract 150 on both sides...
Alex = 800 - 150 + Paul
... Alex = 650 + Paul
Now we got the answer for our question :
The answer - Alex has $650 than Paul.
Hope my answer helps!!
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
t represents time (probably years).
The population of bobcats can't be negative, so negative values in the range do not make sense.
The function is continuous, but you're probably only looking at discrete values.
