Answer:
4.086 or rounded to 4.1
Step-by-step explanation
Since we need to combine the amounts he ran on each day we need to add. We need to add normally and then add the decimal after the number 4. make sure to add km at the end to label your answer.
Answer:
I believe its option c 6
Step-by-step explanation:
in the chart, 6 is the smallest number started on
The "line of best fit" is the result of a linear regression computation. If you have done that, you already know its equation.
If you have "eye-balled" the line into place, then you have to figure out its equation from points you read on the graph. We take a couple of the points to be ... (2001, 1700) and (2010, 2450)
The line through these points will have the equation
... y = (2450 -1700)/(2010 -2001)(x -2001) +1700
... y = (250/3)(x -2001) +1700
Putting x=2013 into this equation, we get ...
... y = (250/3)(2013 -2001) +1700
... = (250/3)(12) +1700
... y = 2700
The population is predicted to be 2700 in 2013.
_____
Had you drawn your graph with a vertical grid line at 2013, you could have read the number from the graph.
Answer:
No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.
X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1
n₁= 12
X[bar]₁= 1000mg
S₁= 23 mg
X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2
n₂= 15
X[bar]₂= 1016mg
S₂= 24mg
It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?
The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05
since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:
[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ±
*
]


[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57*
]
[-34.80;2.80] mg
The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.
I hope it helps!
Answer:
84 cubes but im not sure if youre saying the cubes are 1/2 inch or smth else
Step-by-step explanation: