The correct answer is C. Able to develop their own definition of the situation
Explanation:
The emergent-norm theory is a theoretical perspective that is used to explain the behavior of groups or people or crowds, this proposes crowds or large groups of people often follow certain norms that determine their behavior but these norms are not fixed but fluctuate or change according to the situation. This also implies each individual adapts to the crowd in his own terms and evolved with it. Additionally, when the group of people or crowd forms norms of behavior are developed implicitly according to the situation which opposes other theories that state crowds act impulsively and do not act following any guide. Considering this, it can be concluded emergent-norm theory state crowds are able to develop their own definition of the situation.
Answer:
<em>B, D</em>
Explanation:
Just took the test. Trust me if your for <u>connexus</u>!
Children advance in a number of cognitive domains during middle childhood including:
- working memory capacity,
- attention span, and
- the use of memory techniques.
<h3>What is the evolution of cognition?</h3>
Cognitive development is a branch of neuroscience and psychology that focuses on how a child develops in terms of language learning, perceptual abilities, conceptual resources, and other features of the fully formed adult brain.
The stages of a child's cognitive development are described by Piaget. Changes to the cognitive process and abilities occur during cognitive growth.
Children develop the fundamental abilities for creating good social connections during middle childhood, which is typically described as the ages of six to twelve.
Learn more about Piaget's cognitive development:
brainly.com/question/14282522
#SPJ1
Alike: dictatorship is led by a leader who has all of the power and glorify violence
you cant have freedom of speech and strongly <span>against </span>
different:The most important difference between Fascism and National Socialism is the latter’s racist character and accent on ethnicity. Granted, Mussolini’s regime in a later stage did contain racist elements, but this was due mainly to its ties with Hitler and the Nazis. Other Fascist regimes that were established around the same time in Europe – the ones in Spain under Franco and Portugal under Salazar – could not be accused of fundamentally embracing racism either. As a result, Fascist-like regimes tended not to have any problems with Jews either and if they did, it was – just like Italy – due to their ties with Nazi-Germany. This enabled some Jews – like Mussolini’s mistress Margherita Sarfatti – to eventually become Fascists themselves. In the Netherlands, even the National Socialist Movement had some Jewish members at first since it did not start out as an anti-Semitic organization.
Another important difference is that Fascists favor corporatism (meaning that the sociopolitical organization of a society is to be led by large interest groups) whereas Nazis don’t. Taken everything in consideration, it may be stated that the main difference between Fascism and National Socialism can be described as follows: Fascists focused more on their own state, whereas race was more important to the Nazis.
Well I would personally say the engineering industry, as during the wartime technology needs to be developed/improved in order to defeat the opposing side.
