The answer to this question is A ( Divergence)
The correct answer is: "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing". This fact can be seen in the case of Russian journalist S, who forgot very little but, because of this ability, had difficulty with <em>abstract</em> thinking.
Abstract thinking is defined as the capacity of to think about ideas, facts, objects, thoughts, and principles that are not physical. Theses ideas are abstract because they escape the concept of "here and now" and take thinking to a deeper more symbolic level.
Answer:
Dr. Ingram conducted an C. experimental study.
Explanation:
An experimental study is that in which the variables are in direct control of the researcher. He/she is in control of <em>changing or adjusting</em> them in order to reach an outcome.
Dr. Ingram <em>varied the imageability of items </em>on a list to measure the participants' recalling abilities. He is conducting an experimental study.
Let's see why the other options are not valid in this case:
- A correlational study tries to find correlations between 2 or more variables.
- In a naturalistic study the researcher observes a certain phenomenon.
- An observational study just centers on observing, there is no manipulation of variables.
I'm guessing none? because a rock is not living in the first place
