I believe the answer is: naturalistic observation
Naturalistic observation is being done without any form of variable manipulation from the researchers. The purpose of such observation is to make the result of the study represent the actual condition as close as possible. Usually only applicable for qualitative data.
ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ
<span>ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ</span>
C.) is the correct answer for this question
The type of fallacy that is being described in the scenario
above is the casual fallacy. A casual fallacy is having to use or conclude
ideas in which cause a certain scenario or experience in which is not even
correctly identified.
Dysfluency or post-reinforcement pauses may occur when a student is on a FI and FR schedule of reinforcement. FR schedule stands for <span>Fixed-ratio schedule, which describes when behavior is reinforced when it has occurred a fixed number of times.</span>
Most common this pauses occur from fatigue or are a way of escaping the aversive aspects of the schedule.
The situation in which we take a "break" before setting to work is an example of post-reinforcement pause.
