Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Are there any answer options? I know the answer if you have options
Answer:
The correct answer is overextension.
Explanation:
In the context of language acquisition, it refers to the erroneous over-generalization in the use of a word; that is, to the error that consists in extending the application of words to entities or objects not included in the concept or category of reference, even if they share certain characteristics. For example, the word "dog" is used to correctly designate dogs; but it is also used in reference to any other animal with "four legs."
I believe its owners , but hopefully i helped
Answer: Constraint
Explanation:
The company data is not attached but this should be correct.
Constraints enable companies and entities to engage in sensitivity analysis which would enable them find out optimal quantities of production and production strategy.
Constraints show how much of something is needed to get something done so in making time the constraint, the company is trying to find out how much time is needed in the fabrication department for goods in order for profits to be maximized.