3 years ago

A secondary source might be eliminated by a good researcher because

1 answer:

7 0

Because good researchers rely on first hand account or better said primary evidence. The reason why they rely on primary evidence is because it is usually the most reliable. Much more so than secondary or even tertiary evidence. This enables them to understand the history of a certain topic better.

You might be interested in

Hi! I recently got a new venus flytrap and I was wondering if you have to feed each trap each time it’s ready to eat? Or do you

Daniel [21]

Answer:

only feed one trap at different times

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are some science skills you could use to study fish in an aquarium

Verdich [7]

You could record how much they eat how many times they swim around in a day you could weigh your species of fish.

6 0

3 years ago

When selecting food, the most nutritious option is to select whole foods.<br> O True<br> O False

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Eating more whole foods will help you cut down on calories from the added fats and sugars we get from processed and fast foods. Whole grains. You might think the benefits of whole grains have mostly to do with fiber, but there's so much more than that

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following terms describes the following:

Tamiku [17]

Answer:

specific heat

Explanation:

Can I be brainliest? TYSMMMMMMMMM

4 0

3 years ago

List and explain the different hazards caused by earthquakes (falling objects, collapsing infrastructure, tsunamis).

34kurt

Answer:

Ground Shaking. If an earthquake generates a large enough shaking intensity, structures like buildings, bridges and dams can be severley damaged, and cliffs and sloping ground destabilised. ... Tsunami.Landslides and Rockfalls.Subsidence and Lateral Spreading.Liquefaction

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers