All categories

3 years ago

NEED HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLY IF CORRECT PLEASE HELP 20 POINTS out

Mathematics

2 answers:

EastWind [94]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

It would be -27

Step-by-step explanation:

Math

Scilla [17]3 years ago

7 0

-15x -8y=-27 Thas the answer

You might be interested in

Hey guys, can someone tell me the answer for this question?

Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

root 24+12 is root 36 which is equal to 6

4 root of 6 is 36 the power of 2 which is equal to 36

5 the power of 2 is 25

then when we multiple 6x36x25

it's 5400

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Determine whether triangle M'N'O' is a dilation of triangle MNO.

3241004551 [841]

The answer is:
not a dilation because the points of the image are not moved toward the center of dilation proportionally

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Let A, B, C and D be sets. Prove that A \ B and C \ D are disjoint if and only if A ∩ C ⊆ B ∪ D

ANEK [815]

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to prove both implications of the affirmation.

1) Let's assume that A \ B and C \ D are disjoint, we have to prove that A ∩ C ⊆ B ∪ D.

We'll prove it by reducing to absurd.

Let's suppose that A ∩ C ⊄ B ∪ D. That means that there is an element x that belongs to A ∩ C but not to B ∪ D.

As x belongs to A ∩ C, x ∈ A and x ∈ C.

As x doesn't belong to B ∪ D, x ∉ B and x ∉ D.

With this, we can say that x ∈ A \ B and x ∈ C \ D.

Therefore, x ∈ (A \ B) ∩ (C \ D), absurd!

It's absurd because we were assuming that A \ B and C \ D were disjoint, therefore their intersection must be empty.

The absurd came from assuming that A ∩ C ⊄ B ∪ D.

That proves that A ∩ C ⊆ B ∪ D.

2) Let's assume that A ∩ C ⊆ B ∪ D, we have to prove that A \ B and C \ D are disjoint (i.e. A \ B ∩ C \ D is empty)

We'll prove it again by reducing to absurd.

Let's suppose that A \ B ∩ C \ D is not empty. That means there is an element x that belongs to A \ B ∩ C \ D. Therefore, x ∈ A \ B and x ∈ C \ D.

As x ∈ A \ B, x belongs to A but x doesn't belong to B.

As x ∈ C \ D, x belongs to C but x doesn't belong to D.

With this, we can say that x ∈ A ∩ C and x ∉ B ∪ D.

So, there is an element that belongs to A ∩ C but not to B∪D, absurd!

It's absurd because we were assuming that A ∩ C ⊆ B ∪ D, therefore every element of A ∩ C must belong to B ∪ D.

The absurd came from assuming that A \ B ∩ C \ D is not empty.

That proves that A \ B ∩ C \ D is empty, i.e. A \ B and C \ D are disjoint.

7 0

3 years ago

Find the indicated limit, if it exists.

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

d) The limit does not exist

General Formulas and Concepts:

Calculus

Limits

Right-Side Limit: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to c^+} f(x)$
Left-Side Limit: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to c^-} f(x)$

Limit Rule [Variable Direct Substitution]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to c} x = c$

Limit Property [Addition/Subtraction]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to c} [f(x) \pm g(x)] = \lim_{x \to c} f(x) \pm \lim_{x \to c} g(x)$

Step-by-step explanation:

*Note:

In order for a limit to exist, the right-side and left-side limits must equal each other.

Step 1: Define

Identify

$\displaystyle f(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ccc}5 - x,\ x < 5\\8,\ x = 5\\x + 3,\ x > 5\end{array}$

Step 2: Find Right-Side Limit

Substitute in function [Limit]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 5^+} 5 - x$
Evaluate limit [Limit Rule - Variable Direct Substitution]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 5^+} 5 - x = 5 - 5 = 0$

Step 3: Find Left-Side Limit

Substitute in function [Limit]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 5^-} x + 3$
Evaluate limit [Limit Rule - Variable Direct Substitution]: $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 5^+} x + 3 = 5 + 3 = 8$