Answer:
Time, t = 80 seconds
Explanation:
Given that,
The frequency of the oscillating mass, f = 1.25 Hz
Number of oscillations, n = 100
We need to find the time in which it makes 100 oscillations. We know that the frequency of an object is number of oscillations per unit time. It is given by :
t = 80 seconds
So, it will make 100 oscillations in 80 seconds. Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer:
F = 8.6 10⁻¹² N
Explanation:
For this exercise we use the law of conservation of energy
Initial. Field energy with the electron at rest
Em₀ = U = q ΔV
Final. Electron with velocity, just out of the electric field
Emf = K = ½ m v²
Em₀ = Emf
e ΔV = ½ m v²
v =√ 2 e ΔV / m
v = √(2 1.6 10⁻¹⁹ 51400 / 9.1 10⁻³¹)
v = √(1.8075 10¹⁶)
v = 1,344 10⁸ m / s
Now we can use the equation of the magnetic force
F = q v x B
Since the speed and the magnetic field are perpendicular the force that
F = e v B
F = 1.6 10⁻¹⁹ 1.344 10⁸ 0.4
For this exercise we use the law of conservation of energy
Initial. Field energy with the electron at rest
Emo = U = q DV
Final. Electron with velocity, just out of the electric field
Emf = K = ½ m v2
Emo = Emf
.e DV = ½ m v2
.v = RA 2 e DV / m
.v = RA (2 1.6 10-19 51400 / 9.1 10-31)
.v = RA (1.8075 10 16)
.v = 1,344 108 m / s
Now we can use the equation of the magnetic force
F = q v x B
Since the speed and the magnetic field are perpendicular the force that
F = e v B
F = 1.6 10-19 1,344 108 0.4
F = 8.6 10-12 N
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
This is true!!
Good luck hope this helped!
