Considering the p-value of 0.6, the decision is that we do not reject the null hypothesis.
<h3>What are the hypothesis tested?</h3>
At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportions are equal, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if they are different, that is:
<h3>What is the decision rule?</h3>
- If the p-value is greater than the significance level, we do not reject the null hypothesis.
- If the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.
In this problem, the significance level is of 0.1, while the p-value is of 0.6, hence the correct decision for the test is to not reject the null hypothesis.
More can be learned about p-values and hypothesis tests at brainly.com/question/16313918
I’m pretty sure it’s
The Sahara Desert is a natural resource that stretches across Africa in an area that is almost as big as the United States.
:)
Water (H2O)
remember the photosynthesis reaction equation!
<span>Let us say that I have three or more optical telescopes networkes together and evenly spaced out along a radius of one kilometer. If I pointed all of the telescopes towards the same object in the sky, would that amount to looking at the observed object with a two-kilometer telescope or does this only work when measuring radio waves? In other words, is there any advantage to placing optical telescopes in a large array or not? Wouldn't the image show more detail with each telescope added? Wouldn't it be easier to determine the speed, rotation and direction of solar bodies such as asteroids? The only telescope arrays that I know of has to do with the measurement of radio waves. </span>
That’s a question , u should answer. not someone else. because it’s a question in ur music class??
