Answer:
38 5/28
Step-by-step explanation:
Well start with the whole numbers 24 and 13 This is adding so that means everything has to be added together. 13+24=37 Now, lets go the fractions.
Find the LCD (Least Common Denominator) of 3/4 and 3/7 and rewrite to solve with the equivalent fractions. (remember the Denominator is the BOTTOM PART of the Fraction. Such as the 4 in 3/4.)
LCD = 28
21/28 + 12/28 = 33/28 which can be simplified to 1 5/28. Combining the whole and fraction parts 37 + 1 + 5/28 = 38 5/28 And that will be your answer. Another way you can do this is
converting mixed numbers to fractions Meaning put them in improper form where the numerator (the top number of a fraction is bigger than the denominator such as 4/3) , our initial equation becomes, 99/4 + 94/7
Applying the fractions formula for addition,
(99×7) + (94×4) / 4×7
= 693+376 / 28 =
= 1069/ 28
Simplifying 1069/28, the answer is
= 38 5/28
And one more thing. An easier way to make a mixed number a improper fraction is the multiply the denominator by the whole number then add the numerator and whatever the denominator is it stays for example
38 5/28.
28 times 38 = 1064 then add the 5 and you get 1069! But we aren't done yet, the denominator was 28 so that means the full answer is 1069/28 and that is the Improper fraction form!
Hope this helps! (sorry I took so long)
~R.C aka dj
Answer:
Both legs would be 20
Step-by-step explanation:
In the image below, it shows the relationship between the legs and the hypotenuse in every 45 45 90 triangle. If we know that the hypotenuse is 20, then the 2 legs are both 20.
I am slightly confused with the problem since they asked for the "short" leg and the "long" leg. Both legs should be the same length because a 45 45 90 triangle is isosceles, with the two legs being the same length.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The missing details in the question are:
Required
The perimeter
This is calculated as:
So, we have:
Open bracket
Rewrite as:
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a reflection. A reflection is a transformation involving two shapes looking the same by "bouncing it off a line without coming back.( meaning a reflection goes some where else not to it original poistion.)
Others reason why Why?
Line m is perpendicular to Line c.
B and E are equidistant from c that BC=CE.
Why the others are wrong.
While you could rotate this triangle 180 degrees, the transformation occurs about a line not a point. So using a rotation is wrong.
A translation doesnt occur about a line.
A guide reflection doesnt work since the transformations are already mapped correctly if you do the reflection. It doesnt need a translation.
