Answer:
Comparative negligence
Explanation:
Comparative negligence is action in tort which can be regarded as a partial defense in a tortious case that limits the quantum of damages that a complainant in a negligence-based case can be awarded by the court. This is so because of the complainant's contribution to the damage caused by the defendant. Therefore the number of damages to be given to the complainant will be proportionate to his contribution to the damage. So, in a case where the plaintiff complains of the negligence of another person where he is also a contributor and institute a negligence case in tort, the court will use the comparative negligence approach to award damages to the complainant and his amount of damages will depend on the quantum of his contribution to the action.
Answer:
A. usually involves going into debt
Explanation:
correct in edg
Answer:
Social Loafing
Explanation:
When a person is put in a group a person puts less effort in a job, this situation is know as social loafing.
There are various factors which leads to social loafing:
Motivation: A person is less likely to put lees effort in a job when the person is already not interested in the job. This is exacerbated if the person is put in a group.
Diffusion of responsibility: When a person is doing a job alone then all the responsibility lies on the person. But, when the person is put in the group the responsibility gets distributed among the members. They start believing that better equipped people can do the job better which leads to them not putting all their effort.
Group size: The larger the group size the lower the effort
Hence, due to the factors explained above Jason would experience social loafing.
The answer is the magna carta
