Answer:
Mass of the steel cube = 7800 kg
Volume of the steel = 1.025 cubic centimetre
Explanation:
Given:
The density of the steel = 7.8
Side of the cube = 12 cm
<u>(1)The mass of steel cube :</u>
We know that,
We are given with density and sides of the cube
then volume of the cube
= 
= 
= 1000 cubic centimetre
Now
mass = 7800 kg
<u>(2)volume of steel:</u>
Given the mass = 8 kg
Substituting the values
volume = 1.025 cubic centimetre
The point of the orbit closest to Earth<span> is called perigee, while the point farthest from </span>Earth<span> is known as apogee</span>
Answer:
<h2>30 J</h2>
Explanation:
The work done by an object can be found by using the formula
workdone = force × distance
From the question
force = 6 N
distance = 5 m
We have
workdone = 6 × 5 = 30
We have the final answer as
<h3>30 J</h3>
Hope this helps you
Answer:
a) -5.40 rad/s
b) -2.842 rad/s²
Explanation:
The direction is important in dealing with such questions. Clockwise is considered negative and counterclockwise is considered positive
a) Δω = final angular velocity - initial angular velocity
= -2.70 rad/s - 2.70 rad/s
= -5.40 rad/s
b) ∝ = Δω/Δt = (-5.40 rad/s)/1.90s = -2.842 rad/s²
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
