1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
2 years ago
15

For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

You might be interested in
Write the quadratic equation in factored form. Be sure to write the entire equation. x^2 + x - 12 = 0
nignag [31]
X^2 + X - 12 = 0

(X + 4)(X - 3) = 0

X = -4 and X = 3.
3 0
3 years ago
425x4 solve using partial product method
cluponka [151]
The answer to the question is 1700
7 0
3 years ago
What is the median?<br> -2 -3 8 -6 -9
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

its the middle number so you put them in order and get the ndeswer just whatevers in the midde

-9 -6 -3 -2 8

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELP ME ASAP I AM TIMED explain ur asnwer DONT GUESS THATS REALLY IMMATURE AND RUDE
Sav [38]
The answer is D

See attached picture:

8 0
3 years ago
Simplify the quotient (4.5 x 10^3)/(9 x 10^7 ). Write your answer in scientific notation. Show your work.
marishachu [46]
To answer the problem above, divide the numerical portion and the exponential portion of the given numbers. 4.5 divided by 9 is 0.5. Furthermore, 10^3 divided by 10^7 is 10^-4. The answer is 
                    
                                            0.5 x 10^-4

This may still be written in a standard form,
 
                                               5 x 10^-5

Thus, the answer is <em>5 x 10^-5</em>. 
                                    
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Someone help me answer these 3 questions because they are due by 5:00 today plz questions 12-14
    5·1 answer
  • Help!<br> What is the measure of angle K in the triangle below?
    7·1 answer
  • Say your car doesn’t run on straight gasoline and you have to mix the oil with gas together in a specific ratio of 2.4 fl oz of
    12·1 answer
  • 30 yards of fabric is needed to make 10 dresses.The fabric roll stamped 35 meters.About how many yards do you have (round to the
    9·1 answer
  • The map shows ancient and modern cities on the Indian subcontinent.
    14·2 answers
  • Josh bought 2 pairs of jeans for $25.60 each and some shirts for $15.30 each. If he spent a total of $112.40,
    14·1 answer
  • What is the equation of the line that passes through the point (-4, 2) and has a slope of -5/4?​
    7·1 answer
  • Kira made 4 identical necklaces, each having beads and a pendant. The total cost of the beads and pendants for all 4 necklaces w
    15·1 answer
  • What is the sale price of jeans which regularly cost $28, but now are 10% off ?
    5·2 answers
  • Can some one help quickly. Please show work
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!