Answer:
The amount of the last annual dividend paid is <u>$4.3</u>.
Explanation:
Given:
The common stock of Zeta Group sells for $42 per share, has a rate of return of 12.2 percent, and a dividend growth rate of 1.8 percent annually.
Now, to find the amount of last annual dividend paid.
Let the amount of last annual dividend paid be 
Price of per share (
) = 
Rate of return (
) = 
Rate of dividend growth (
) = 
Now, to get the amount of last dividend paid we put formula:




<em>Multiplying both sides by 0.104 we get:</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Dividing both sides by 1.018 we get:</em>


Therefore, the amount of the last annual dividend paid is $4.3.
Answer:
Cash provided by operating activities is 89.000
Explanation:
The indirect method involves the adjustment of net income with changes in balance sheet accounts to arrive at the amount of cash generated by operating activities.
It depends on the account if it is added or subtracted to net income. Below you will find the added account with a plus (+) and the subtracted ones with a minus (-)
Notice the amounts of any decreases are in parentheses.
Net income 65.000
Adjustment to reconcile the net income to cash
+ Depreciation expense 8.000
+ Current assets decrease 7.000
+ Current liabilities increase 9.000
Net cash 89.000
Answer:
$2,340
Explanation:
The computation of cash received from this loan is shown below:-
cash received from this loan = Approved amount - (Approved amount × Two year × Percentage of loan
)
= Approved amount - ($3,000 × 2 × 11%
)
= $3,000 - ($3,000 × 2 × 0.11
)
= $3,000 - $660
= $2,340
Therefore, for computing the cash will Patricia receive from this loan we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
<span>In the insurance market, this is referred to as adverse selection. Adverse selection is simply just a situation where the seller has information that the buyer does not have about an aspect of the product or its quality, or vice versa. When it comes to insurance, adverse selection is the likelihood of those who preform dangerous jobs or are high risk to get life insurance.</span>