Yes; a triangle is formed:
<span>______________________________________________________</span>
m∡A = 17° ;
m∡B = 137° (given) ;
m∡C = 26° ;
a = 6 ;
b = 14 (given) ;
c = 9 (given) .
______________________________________________________
Explanation:
______________________________________________________
Note:
The law of sines:
(sin A) / a = (sin B) / b = (sin C) / c ;
______________________________________________________
Given:
______________________________________________________
B = 137 ;
c = 9 ;
b =14 ;
______________________________________________________
(sin B) / b = (sin C) / c ;
(sin 137) / 14 = (sin C) / 9 ;
(0.681998360062) / 14 = 0.0487141685758571 = (sin C) / 9 ;
______________________________________________________
sin C = (0.0487141685758571) * (9) ;
sin C = 0.4384275171827139 ;
Take the "arc sin" of each side of the equation; to isolate "C" on one side of the equation; and to solve for "C" ;
arc sin (C) = arc sin ( 0.4384275171827139) ;
C = 26.003593520741 ; round to 26.
If all angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees: then:
A + B + C = 180 ;
A + 137 + 26 = 180 ;
A + 163 = 180 ;
Subtract "163" from each side of the equation; to isolate "A" on one side of the equation; and to solve for "A" ;
A + 163 − 163 = 180 − 163 ;
A = 17 ;
Now, to solve for "a" ;
(sin A) / a = (sin B)/ b ;
(sin 17) / a = 0.0487141685758571 ;
(0.0487141685758571) a = (sin 17) ;
Divide EACH SIDE of the equation by: "(0.0487141685758571)" ;
______________________________________________________
to isolate "a" on one side of the equation; and to solve for "a" ;
______________________________________________________
[(0.0487141685758571)a ] / (0.0487141685758571) =
(sin 17) / (0.0487141685758571) ;
_________________________________________________________
a = (sin 17) / (0.0487141685758571) ;
= (0.292371704723) / (0.0487141685758571) ;
a = 6.0017796314787227112 ; round to "6" .
_________________________________________________________
Oleg, Sasha, and Dima shared 600 toys. Sasha had twice as many toys as Oleg. Dima had 40 more toys than Oleg.
Let the number of toys Oleg has = x
Let the number of toys Sasha has = y
Let the number of toys Dima has = z
Sasha had twice as many toys as Oleg
So y = 2*x= 2x
Dima had 40 more toys than Oleg.
z = x + 40
Oleg, Sasha, and Dima shared 600 toys
x + y + z= 600
We know y=2x and z=x+40
Replace it for y and z



Subtract 40 on both sides

Divide by 4 on both sides

Oleg had 140 toys
As your testing H0:p=0.79, then you have a two-tailed test.
The p-value at two-tailed test is given by:

Then, you need to check into the standard normal cumulative table to find at which -z you do have a probability of 0.395. Thus:
As you can see in the picture at z=-0.26 you have a P(Z<=-z)=0.3974
And at z=-0.27 you have a P(Z<=-z)=0.3936.
The average of these values is:

Then, you have a probability of 0.395 at a z of:

Then -z=-0.27, thus z=0.27
Answer:
yes there is a linear correlation
reason : a increase of 1 hour results in an increase of 3 height
y= 3x + 4
it has a positive slope of 3 ,and y intercept of 4
Step-by-step explanation:
now, this is pretty much the same as the one before it with Jaime, so I'll do this without much fuss.
recall d = rt.
a = Alfonso's rate
with the wind his speed is a + 5, against it is a - 5, 60 miles with it and 30 miles against it, all in the same time of t hours.
