Answer:
The slope is -1. Use the rise over run method for the two given points.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Within the sentence, it explicitly states "the war was a vehicle for lasting social and economic gains." In other words, the war led to a better future in terms of social and economic gains for discriminated groups (discriminated groups were mentioned in the beginning of the sentence which gives us the who). Some may argue D is correct, but I strongly side with C instead because D emphasizes discrimination <em>ended</em>, while the sentence makes no such claim. The sentence only states discriminatory issues were improved, but still not completely absent. As for A, there is no mention of technology in the sentence. In terms of B, the sentence refers to the "gains" or improvement of discrimination and not the "plague" or worsening of discrimination. Hence, C fits best.
Applying the distance formula, the distance from from Tia's home to Lei's home = 14.4 units.
<h3>What is the Distance Formula?</h3>
The distance formula helps us to find the distance between two given coordinate points. It is expressed as,
.
Tia = (4, 8) = (x1, y1)
Lei = (12, 20) = (x2, y2)
Apply the distance formula to find the distance from Tia's home to Lei's home:
d = √[(12−4)² + (20−8)²]
d = √[(8)² + (12)²]
d = √(64 + 144)
d = √208
d ≈ 14.4 units
The distance from from Tia's home to Lei's home = 14.4 units.
Learn more about the distance formula on:
brainly.com/question/661229
Answer:
Kevin should attend the career development course because the expected value of attending the career development course is greater than the expected value of not attending the career development course.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the consulting company claims that if job seekers attend the company's career development course their chance of obtaining a job is greatly increased is true then Kevin's chance of getting a job over the next year which is 76% will greatly increase.
The average salary in Kevin's desired profession is $61,207.11 if he attends the company career development course then there would be an increase of $7, 295.00. To sum, Kevin is expected to receive an annual salary of $68, 502.11. The cost of the course is only $2,763.00. If we subtract the cost from his annual salary: $68,502.11 - 2763 = $65, 739.11, there would be an increase on his salary. So, Kevin should attend the career development course because the expected value of attending the career development course is greater than the expected value of not attending the career development course.
It is true due to the commutative property of multiplication. If all of your operations are multiplication, then the integers can move around and you can still get the same answer.
^This is only true if you meant to type (1.8x3)x2.1=(1.8x2.1)x3
If you meant what you typed, then the equation is false. The left side would be 3 times the value of the right side due to the 3 being on the left side and not the right side while without the 3 the two sides would be equal.