D wheat and oats are the dominate crops in Japan
Answer:
It ocurred a selection by allopatric speciation
Explanation:
The allopatric speciation refers to the evolution in which the same specie starts developing different characteristics because of geographic barrers and this characteristics after some time generates two different specie.
It happens because usually according to the environment or the predators, species have to develop different adaptations so they can survive. In this case we have two different types of camouflage adaptations made by the salamanders acording to the conditions so for one specie it is better to camouflage from the predator mean while to the other is better to use lived colors to seem as it is a poisonous animal and in this way avoid the predators.
So you can see the same specie develop different strategies to survive because of a geographic separation, generating an allopatric speciation.
Answer:
Environmental factors can influence natural selection because they can increase or decrease the amount of genetic variation in a population.
Explanation:
Natural selection is a process that involves the survival of species through changes in the expression of their genes, making possible the process of adaptation to environmental changes. It is one of the explanations for the biological evolution of species.
The second premise, necessary for natural selection to be possible, implies the existence of a variability (genetics) of traits among individuals in a population.
The other premises of natural selection are the faculty of traits to be inheritable and that genetic variability should lead to reproductive success and survival.
- <em>The other options are not related to the process of natural selection, since it is not possible for natural selection to increase or decrease the number of chromosomes, in addition to the fact that genetic variability must be observed in a population, not in a single individual, to be considered natural selection </em>
Answer:
i think less is more
Explanation:
let me explain so i think less would be better because then you wound have as many people that are homeless or refugees we all wish refugees could find safe homes but for all of them that just isn't possible.Then again i don't think that you should resort to genocide when trying to maintain a smaller population.Though one could argue the opposite.
(you can come to your own conclusion this is just my opinion)
