Answer: d. All of the above are examples of the principle that trade can make everyone better off.
Explanation:
We make a trade when we exchange services in which we benefits while the other part or the other person also benefit.
Americans buying socks from china that means the business from China is benefitting financially whilst the people in America are benefiting from using this product .
Drinks bought in Maine from Florida befits the Florida business whilst people in Maine are also benefiting from buying and enjoying these drinks.
A kid from next door mowing the lawn will benefits financially as the neighbor pays him whilst the neighbor is benefiting from his service of having his lawn mowed .
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I agree very much with that statement. very inspirational ❤
The correct answer is letter D
The use of the intervention response model (RTI) is a necessary model to ensure that learning difficulties are not the result of an instruction that does not prioritize the skills considered by the literature as predictors for learning to read and write in a system of learning alphabetic writing, this model can assure the teacher, through tutoring, the early identification of the real schoolchildren at risk for reading problems, thus avoiding low school performance and minimizing the false positive result and false negative.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
